Regarding an article in the Macleans magazine shamefully lifted from my Dr's office. There is an article concerning the "mental" stability of us ovarian carring society and how it does not differ from country to country. Apparently, women are unstable being judged by researchers and "professionals". This urks me to no end.
Get this…since Psyc Dr.s and researchers, as well as their patients, still adhere to a masculine standard of mental health, women, by definition are viewed as psychiatrically impaired. I resent this ideal. Weather they accept or reject the female role-simply because we are women, and given this fact it is not surprising that most literature of non-hospitalized populations reported greater female than male "neurosis" [sp?] or psychosis often regardless of martial status, age, race, social class or nationality. Why are women so emotionally disturbed more than our male counterparts?
Afghanistan is a terrible culture however it is widely accepted that women need to be and should be suppressed. Me Tarzan you Jane…. Cheetah had more rights…Well, he got the ripe banana but if there were ever a stereotype…Jane could use conjunctives.
Men are far too abusive and suppressive toward women who carry life into our body to appease them. Impending breakdowns by the populous estrogen society carry themselves for the most part needy on men to hurt them.
This conversation with myself brings heavy thoughts caused by images of women in Berka’s being murdered while the little daughters watched, afraid of showing emotion and not being able to touch their mother to take her from the street. Woman being tortured righteously by their husbands... little girls being raped by authorities...all these are so close to the birth place of Jesus Christ yet so far removed.
We must always wonder, comparing the totals from two separate populations, weather the differences are due to unintentional compromises of method to have crept in. If the two populations have contrasting cultures or economic levels, this kind of doubling is increased. Does population X, for instance appear to have more cases than population Y because culture X produces more cases or is it because culture X affects the criteria and methods employed make it seem as there were more cases? Put any other way, when two populations differ markedly in their cultural condition, do these differences may make any attempt to count cases amount to using a different indicator in each culture?
Nope...world wide, the percentile of depressed women basically out numbers our "superior" counterparts. I think I'll go spend a third day screaming, pooh-poohing, crying, crocodile tears and create generalized madness, as I see fit to be fashionably be restrained in a straight jacket without question as I do have estrogen.
"The insistence that femininity evolves from necessarily frustrated masculinity makes femininity a sort of normal pathology" ~ Judith Bardwick
Teresa.
No comments:
Post a Comment